The mid-part of October my son's scooter got stolen. If you've browsed my site, then you will see the details and a photo. There are approximately 250 posters plastered throughout the Denver-Metro area with a description, photo, phone numbers and offering a reward.

Several calls have been received with spottings, however, none have actually panned out -- i.e., if it is the scooter, it was traveling down the street going one way and the caller was traveling the other way, so the exact destination is not known; or, it was seen at such and such place, but upon arriving, it was already gone.

All calls are appreciated and all leads followed through! THANK YOU!

When I receive a spotting call, I always take down the particulars and ask their name and number -- so if it is *the* scooter, they can be paid the reward. "That is not the reason I am calling -- I just want to help, and please let me know if that was it!" Not ONE of the callers have wanted a reward -- not until a call a few minutes ago. A message was left on my cell stating that they saw the scooter for sale and that I needed to call ASAP and they would give me the price. Returning the call, the conversation goes something like:

"Uh, yeah, what's the reward?"
$100.00. Where did you see it at?
"Oh, only $100?"
Yes, where did you see it?
"I don't know if it's worth my time looking for it."  

Amazing, just amazing - if it looks like a duck and quacks like a duck -- it sure sounds like a thief to me -- wanting to get paid for something he stole because why does the voice message go from seeing it for sale, to the return call seeing if it's worth my time to look for it?
[end of blog]

Unless someone is living under a rock, in seclusion or without electricity, it's hard to miss the fact that the world is facing a financial crisis -- so let me get this right -- since announcing Sarah Palin as a Vice Presidential candidate, $150,000.00 (ONE HUNDRED FIFTY THOUSAND DOLLARS) has been spent on clothing at Saks Fifth Avenue and Neiman Marcus -- clothing and accessories, which is now reported, will go to a charitable purpose after the campaign -- so does this mean that if she becomes our next Vice President, her brand spankin' new $150,000 wardrobe will still go to charity?--and if so, what will the clothing/makeup price tag be for an actual Vice President, or will she be going back to her 'plain Jane' style?

--and $13,000 spent on makeup and hair in a two-month period? Gosh, golly, darn -- tell me it ain't so.

And no, this is not a political dig at either side! It's actually a slap in the face on the price tag placed on image, instead of focusing on what is inside a person -- ANY PERSON and not just a public figure. We've definitely got our priorities in the wrong place -- which goes full circle to why the world is in a financial crisis.
P.S. How ironic -- I just received a broadcast spam email from the Republican party "3 Reasons Why You Need To Contribute Today" -- hmmmm, I didn't waste my time opening the email to see what the three reasons were, but possibly the money is needed for teeth whitening, hair spray, maybe a bobby pin, ... 

[end of blog]

There are people that no matter what they do, they just can't get a break. They have a black cloud over their head that follows them everywhere. My son, Dennis, is one such person - he has a heart of gold, but for every two steps forward, he gets pushed back six.

On Sunday, October 12, 2008 his scooter was stolen from 606 E. 13th Ave., Denver, CO (Capitol Hill).  His scooter (and sole means of transportation) is a 1983 Honda Passport 70cc. Scooters less than a certain cc are not required to be licensed in Colorado. Therefore, the scooter does not have a license plate. It is blue and white with some turn signal damage.

The scooter does not resemble the numerous "newer" scooters that are seen on today's streets. In fact, I have never seen another scooter that even resembles Dennis' Passport -- the body is narrower; the tires are narrower and taller.

Please if you spot it, either being ridden or parked, please call my cell phone immediately - 303-594-6453. A reward is being offered.
[end of blog]

As a professional transcriptionist, I believe I am one of the fairest and honest service providers an attorney, business or individual will come across.

With that said, however, I am not a "kitchen table setup" working for milk money -- however, with a gallon of milk inching closer and closer to $6.00/gallon, milk money isn't the same as it was when I was a school child.

People that don't regularly have a need for a lot of "spoken words being put to paper," are usually of the belief that a one hour recording will take one hour to type. As was said in last night's Vice Presidential Debate "It's just not so, Joe!"

There are just too many variables that determine a finished price without first hearing the audio: the number of speakers -- the more speakers, the longer it will take; the clarity of the recording -- was it professionally recorded? How many microphones and where were the microphones placed?; What about background noise?--was the audio recorded in a locked up and sealed room?--most likely not, or is there noise from traffic, air conditioning, paper shuffling, coughing/sneezing, phone intercom announcements?, etc.

Anytime you are dealing with more than two voices, the time to transcribe increases -- dealing with a group of five or more increases considerably, and any group over 12 people, increases drastically.

Requesting verbatim - putting EVERYTHING said on paper costs more than just getting down the "gist" of what was said. A group of people, all with different voices, different tones, different dialogues/dialects increases the total transcription time.

Browse around my site and see EXACTLY what you get when you hire me -- still not sure, then please check around and inquire about other's prices and exactly what they provide and what YOU get in return. If my quoted rate and someone else's are way apart, ask yourself "why is that?"
[end of blog]